What there is and what we observe?

lets imagine this. The universe is expanding infinatly. The thing we call time is opening up like a triangle. We have every possible outcome in this triangle. We only live one existance, but really all our existences are paralleled. Lets imagine that we only observe points along this pathway. What exist is only what we observe. I keep reading about observation of the surrounding world that some amazing scientist seem to point to and imply we lack. I was just reading about inductance i hope to gain a better understanding of it but it occered to me that if someone gave me all the simple equations i could probably put them together and learn it in a way i understand. But instead im sat looking at loads of equations that have came from other equations thinking i might as well memorise these and hope i start to understand them. So many other people must do the same and rely oh others discovered facts. When it would be so much better to think for ourself and just try to put things together in a way we understand and build up out own picture. Its not like there are not thousands of things science still cant explain. For my exams i just memorise whats in a book. Equations and facts but its pointless really its just a memory test for me. I dont always understand how the equations in physics where formulated. It would take too long to explain so i have faith in what we are taught. But then something like week nuclear interaction pops up and wtf. When is science going to explain that one. . What if when people talk about observing the world around us, they are implying something different. Like we only are able to observe a fraction of what there is so out understanding is vague.. What if we have something like a photon. It has a constant string of forms it can take between wave and particle. But we cant imagine how this is possible because it oscillates between the two, between the observed time frames. We only observe it when its either particle or proton. We dont actually oberve it at all in this way but this is the way we have to imagine we observe it probably because this is actually what we observe. Like when we use a diffraction grating to diffract light. Then we observe the photoelectric effect and puzzle. What exist is only what we observe really so the intermediates dont exist to us. Therefore we cant imagine how its possible. So to have forces we have to be able to observe space as in dimensions. there has to also be a point in between the dimensions we observe so small that it doesnt exist because we never observe it. Remember my hypothesis is that only what we observe exist. Space is part of the triangular pyramid, forces one length, space another and the other is time. The lines that have no parameter are coming from one corner. This is the big bang or the start of everything from nothing. But remember as we get closer to that corner we never reach it. This is agin why we cant comprehend one over infinity. Because we dnt observe it. So what if in between what we observe there is like this sea of time, sea of space and sea of force. Correct me if im wrong but doeswnt this mean the side of the triangle pyramid that is force, exands at the same rate as space side or dimension side. This would imply that the force is needed to create space, hence hold particles apart :/ or together. Or just in position. If we could tap into it between what we actually observe then surely we could harvest the sea of the force ect then when we harvest it it would be observed :/. It sounds like a bonkers idea but its just a mad suggestion. Its not like anyone else can actually make a link between gravity and other forces, time and space and no one can comprehend the infinat sized universe.We never get to observe infinite sized space, because the triangular pyramid is just expanding and hasnt got there yet But it will exist. call me mad but your no better off because you dont know any more than i do what gravity is really and what causes it, or what weak nuclear force is, its just our way of making up what we cant explain. like wave particle duality ect. Just going on someone elses facts to support our own. It reminds me of when i do an iteration and stick in first initial value that is out. It never homes in on real answer. Instead it goes off further and further form the real answer. Maybe we should observe basics and build up new ideas from that. Like when we do a whole calculation again not take the number form the first part that we have already rounded off. Does anyone else think we might be going off the wrong way with science, like that iteration i did wrong. Getting to the wrong conclusions. Not observing basic things :'/???